 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| andrewmother fucking hutchins, mother fucking money , mature, movies of mature women , mature movies tgp , mature movies , mature movies galleries , vintage mature porn , nudists, andrei codrescu, old mature lesbians , harassment, mature asian tgp , mature hairy pussy porn , mature ladies xxx , mature women movies , mature lesbian movies , mother seduces son, mature porn site reviews , | Even if none of this occurred to them then why didn't anyone at least think of the Navy's amphibious assult ships to evacuate by sea everyone from the flood caused by the breached levee system? I realize that the ships could not have been in the Gulf in the teeth of the hurricane, but someone anonymity with more forethought than what we saw displayed in the administration's "reaction" to this crisis anonymity would have gotten them ready and sailing empty when 'Katrina' was entering the Gulf, so that they could be steaming into the Gulf behind the hurricane at a safe enough distance and by the next day each amphib. assult ship would be sitting just off the coast and each sending in their dozen or so flat-bottomed landing craft which can run right up to the beach, load fifty or sixty survivors on board and then ferry them out to its 'mothership' as it were and go back in to get more people out. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| You could easily fit nudists more than a thousand people on a single freight train. They could run the trains constantly, with one pulling in when nudists another leaves, full trains leaving for a temporary camp on higher ground nudists and the empties then being shunted off onto another track to be routed back around to rejoin the track heading to New Orleans to save more people. Running the trains at close time intervals would be a hassle, but thousands of lives were at stake. How many trainloads would it have taken to evacuate the 100,000 or so that remained? Eighty? A hundred? Bear in mind, since we're talking about the empty trains going back again, this would not mean it would take eighty or a hundred trains by any means to move this amount of trainloads. Did anyone in the Bush administration, F.E.M.A., etc. even suggest something like this? Buses would've gotten tied up in traffic with everyone evacuating by road that could get out, but trains can move large amounts of people very efficiently avoiding the road network. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
